LATEST NEWS

Truck accidents on the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE) create unique legal challenges compared to regular car crashes. These accidents often cause severe injuries and major property damage due to the massive size and weight of commercial trucks. The BQE, built in the 1940s, was designed to handle vehicles weighing up to 72,000 pounds, yet the legal limit for trucks is 80,000 pounds. Recent studies show that about 10% of trucks on this expressway exceed weight limits, some by more than 115,000 pounds. This overloading puts extra stress on the aging roadway and creates dangerous conditions for all drivers. Truck accident claims involve federal regulations that don’t apply to regular vehicle crashes. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) sets strict rules for truck drivers and companies, including limits on driving hours and required rest periods. Commercial trucks must carry at least $750,000 in insurance coverage, much higher than the $30,000 minimum

Insurance companies use computer programs to decide how much money to offer you after an injury. Two main systems, Colossus and Xactimate, now handle most injury claims in America. Colossus began in Australia in 1988 and now processes over half of all U.S. insurance claims. These programs work by turning your medical records, injury types, and treatment details into numbers and codes. The software assigns “severity points” to your injuries using about 600 different injury codes. These points then convert to dollar amounts through roughly 10,000 built-in rules. While this system might seem fair, it often misses important parts of your story. The programs tend to undervalue soft tissue injuries like whiplash. They also ignore pain and suffering unless clearly written in medical records. Many insurance adjusters who input your data have limited medical training, which can lead to mistakes. The programs focus on things they can measure but miss

Medical malpractice cases that result in life-changing injuries require expert legal representation to secure fair compensation. Attorney Paul G. Lyons, Esq. demonstrated this fact through his successful handling of a landmark case that resulted in a $43 million verdict for a client suffering from catastrophic foot drop and paralysis. With over ten years of experience in both insurance defense and personal injury law, Lyons guided his client through an eight-year legal battle against strong opposition. The case stands out for its thorough evidence gathering and compelling expert witness testimonies that proved clear negligence. The jury awarded $54 million in compensatory damages, covering medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering for the plaintiff who could no longer work. This verdict has set an important legal precedent for future personal injury claims involving medical malpractice. The size of the award shows the serious impact of the injury on the plaintiff’s life.

Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs) play a major role in foot drop cases, often deciding if patients receive needed care. These exams, done by doctors hired by insurance companies, can show bias that affects treatment recommendations. Many patients face an uphill battle when these doctors deny claims or downplay serious conditions. EviCore, which works for America’s largest insurers, denies about 20% of medical procedures in Arkansas alone. Their decisions rely on algorithms that increase denial rates for treatments that might help foot drop patients. Foot drop is a serious condition that makes walking difficult and increases fall risk. It can signal major health problems like spinal stenosis or central nervous system issues. Insurance company doctors often minimize its impact, leading to delayed treatment and sometimes permanent nerve damage. The stakes are high – a recent medical malpractice case in Pennsylvania resulted in an $83,000 award for an undiagnosed leg fracture that

Delivery truck accidents in Brooklyn create complex insurance situations that often involve multiple policies and parties. These crashes happen daily on busy Brooklyn streets, with UPS trucks and other delivery vehicles frequently involved. Unlike regular car crashes, truck accidents bring higher stakes due to commercial insurance policies with larger coverage limits. A single accident can trigger claims against the truck driver, the delivery company, and other parties on the road. The main causes of these accidents include driver fatigue, which plays a role in 13% of all crashes, and distracted driving, which caused 3,166 fatal U.S. crashes in 2017. Poor truck maintenance and improper cargo loading also lead to many accidents, with bad loading causing about 4% of fatal truck crashes in 2021. After such an accident, victims must deal with primary insurance for immediate costs and secondary policies for extra expenses. This process often becomes difficult as insurance companies

Insurance companies handle vehicle damage claims much differently than injury claims after an accident. They often pay for car repairs quickly while dragging their feet on injury compensation. This pattern exists because vehicle damage has clear, measurable costs that are easy to verify. A repair shop provides an estimate, and the insurance company pays based on visible damage. Injury claims, however, present a more complex challenge for insurers. The subjective nature of pain and medical needs creates an opportunity for insurance companies to question and minimize these claims. Major insurers like Allstate work with consulting firms such as McKinsey & Co. to develop tactics known as the “Three Ds” – Delay, Deny, and Defend – specifically to reduce injury payouts. These companies train adjusters to search for ways to shift blame to victims or link injuries to pre-existing conditions. Research shows that people with legal representation receive 3.5 times more