McKinsey’s Impact on Insurance Claims: How Consulting Changed the Way Your Accident Case is Handled
Insurance claims processing has changed dramatically due to McKinsey’s influence in the industry. This global consulting firm has reshaped how insurance companies handle your accident claims through data-driven methods and cost-saving strategies.
McKinsey introduced streamlined processes that cut manual work and added digital tools for faster calculations. Their recommendations led to a 60% reduction in processing times and 20% lower operational costs for insurance underwriters.
Leading insurers improved their loss ratios by 3 to 5 points by following McKinsey’s analytics approach. The firm’s focus on cost reduction helped insurance companies decrease processing expenses by up to 40% while cutting fraudulent claims by 20% through new detection technologies.
Companies like Lemonade Insurance now use AI systems that can settle claims instantly. Despite these efficiency gains, McKinsey’s strategies have faced criticism. Their approach for insurers like Allstate prioritized profits over customer service, including tactics such as making low initial settlement offers.
This practice has sparked legal challenges and increased regulatory attention aimed at protecting consumers. The changes affect how your accident claim gets handled today.
Key Takeaways
- McKinsey’s consulting transformed insurance claims from customer service to profit-driven operations, with companies now using AI to process claims up to 60% faster while cutting operational costs by 30%.
- Insurance companies quickly pay for visible car damage but fight injury claims using the “alligator” method, a tactic that creates an image of fairness while saving millions on costlier injury settlements.
- Data analytics helps insurers spot patterns and reduce fraud by 20%, but this has led to stricter claim approvals and settlements that many policyholders view as unfair.
- Digital tools have replaced face-to-face interactions, with some claims now processed in seconds rather than weeks, though over 30% of customers report dissatisfaction with digital options.
- Standardized evaluation processes remove human judgment from claims decisions, creating uniform methods for assessing damage but often resulting in lower payouts for subjective damages like pain and suffering.
McKinsey’s Role in Transforming Insurance Claims
McKinsey’s consulting transformed insurance claims through data-driven strategies that reshaped the entire industry. Their influence shifted claims handling from customer service to profit optimization, creating systems that insurance companies still use today.
Introduction of streamlined claims processes
Insurance claims handling has changed dramatically with the rise of intelligent case management systems. These systems kick in right after the First Notice of Loss (FNOL), creating a faster path to claim resolution.
Automated processes now cut down manual steps that once slowed claims, allowing customers to schedule repairs directly through digital platforms. The impact is clear – more efficient claims handling leads to quicker settlements and improved customer satisfaction.
Digital tools have standardized back-office operations across the insurance industry, resulting in more consistent outcomes for policyholders. Customers now receive clearer calculations and explanations about their claims, which builds trust in the process.
Despite these advances, repair times for vehicles with advanced features have increased by 25-35%, according to the McKinsey Center for Future Mobility. This challenge shows that while streamlined procedures have improved many aspects of claims management, the complexity of modern vehicles creates new hurdles in the optimized claims workflow.
Prioritization of cost-saving measures
McKinsey transformed the insurance claims landscape by putting cost reduction at the center of their strategy. Their approach focuses on cutting expenses through several key methods.
They promote automation to replace manual tasks, which speeds up processing and reduces labor costs across claims departments. The consulting firm also pushes for AI implementation in fraud detection systems, allowing companies to spot suspicious claims faster and with greater accuracy than human reviewers.
McKinsey’s cost-cutting extends to IT system integration that enables real-time customer interactions. This integration cuts delays and reduces operational expenses while maintaining service levels.
Their digital communication strategies have dramatically reduced call volumes for many insurers. Companies following McKinsey’s playbook report significant drops in customer service costs as policyholders shift to digital channels for claim updates and information requests rather than making phone calls that require staffing.
Implementation of efficiency-focused strategies
Cost-saving measures in insurance have evolved into broader efficiency strategies that reshape how claims are handled. Insurance companies now deploy advanced algorithms and IoT technologies that streamline operations while maintaining service quality.
These efficiency-focused approaches have transformed traditional claims processing into a more responsive system.
Efficiency isn’t just about cutting costs—it’s about creating smarter processes that benefit both insurers and policyholders.
Automation stands at the forefront of these strategies, with experts projecting that over half of all claims processing activities will be automated by 2030. Real-time monitoring capabilities allow insurance companies to track claims progress instantly, reducing response times from days to hours or even minutes.
Underwriting decisions that once took weeks now happen in seconds thanks to these automated systems. The integration of these technologies creates a more predictable and consistent claims experience while helping insurers manage operational expenses.
How McKinsey Redefined Claims Handling
McKinsey revolutionized claims handling by introducing data analytics that predict claim outcomes with remarkable accuracy. Their methods transformed traditional insurance practices through standardized evaluation tools that reduce human judgment in the claims process.
Use of data-driven decision-making
Insurance companies now rely on data-driven decision-making to transform their claims handling processes. Leading insurers apply advanced analytics to improve underwriting performance, resulting in 3 to 5 point improvements in loss ratios.
This shift allows companies to process up to 95 percent of policies without human underwriter involvement, creating faster and more consistent claim evaluations.
Digital platforms equipped with analytics have revolutionized how claims are assessed and processed. These systems pull from vast amounts of third-party data to evaluate risks more accurately while maintaining customer satisfaction.
The result is dramatic – policies that once took days to process can now be quoted and bound within minutes. This efficiency serves both the insurer’s bottom line and provides quicker resolution times for customers filing claims.
Standardization of claims evaluation processes
McKinsey has transformed how insurance companies evaluate claims through strict standardization. This approach creates uniform methods for assessing damage, injury severity, and claim validity across all cases.
Insurers now rely on digital tools that apply the same criteria to every claim, removing subjective judgment that once varied between adjusters. The standardized workflow includes specific checkpoints, documentation requirements, and approval thresholds that claims must meet before payment.
Data analysis drives this standardized process, with AI systems sorting claims into simple or complex categories for appropriate handling. Advanced analytics help insurers route claims to specialized teams based on clear guidelines rather than individual discretion.
This efficiency-focused system allows companies to process more claims with fewer resources while maintaining consistent decisions. The standardized approach also supports fraud detection by flagging unusual patterns that might indicate false claims.
Adoption of automation and AI in claims
Moving beyond standardized evaluation processes, insurance companies now embrace automation and AI to handle claims more efficiently. These technologies process claims faster, with McKinsey research showing a 60% reduction in processing times for insurers using AI systems.
The integration of generative AI allows companies to analyze vast amounts of unstructured data with greater accuracy, leading to quicker decisions and fewer errors.
Insurance firms have seen significant financial benefits from this technological shift. Companies report a 20% decrease in operational costs for underwriting after implementing AI solutions.
These systems excel at detecting patterns that humans might miss, improving fraud detection while streamlining legitimate claims. The combination of AI with other insurance technologies creates powerful tools that give companies a competitive edge in claims management while reducing manual workloads.
The Shift in Customer Experience
McKinsey’s consulting strategies have transformed how customers experience insurance claims, with faster digital processes replacing traditional face-to-face interactions. Read more to discover how these changes affect your accident case handling.
Shortened claims processing timelines
Insurance companies have cut claims processing times dramatically through targeted customer experience initiatives. These changes allow claims that once took weeks to resolve in just days or even hours.
Lemonade Insurance stands out as a leader, using AI technology to process certain claims in as little as two seconds. This speed marks a major shift from traditional methods that required extensive paperwork and multiple phone calls.
Global digitalization has pushed the insurance industry to adapt quickly, especially as customer behaviors changed during recent years. The rise of insurtech companies has set new standards for quick claims resolution.
Faster processing times directly link to higher customer satisfaction scores, as policyholders no longer wait extended periods for claim decisions. These expedited claims approval systems use advanced technology to maintain efficiency while still performing necessary verification steps.
Increased reliance on digital communication
Digital channels have transformed how insurance companies handle claims communication. Customers now track their claims, submit documents, and receive updates without making phone calls.
This shift has cut status inquiry calls dramatically while giving clients more control over their claim process. Many insurers have rebuilt their customer journeys to include digital assets that streamline communication at each touchpoint.
The most successful transformations happen through cross-functional teams that integrate digital tools across all departments.
Despite these advances, customer satisfaction issues remain. Over 30% of insurance customers report feeling unhappy with current digital options. This gap suggests that while digital communication offers efficiency, it may not fully replace the value of face-to-face interactions.
Companies must balance digital convenience with personal touch points that address specific customer needs during the claims process.
Reduced face-to-face interactions
Insurance companies have moved away from in-person meetings thanks to McKinsey’s digital transformation strategies. Property and casualty customers report higher satisfaction with digital channels for claims processing and updates.
This shift cuts customer service costs by reducing status inquiry calls that once required agent time. The change hasn’t pleased everyone, though. More than 30% of insurance customers express dissatisfaction with available digital options, suggesting that human interaction still matters.
Life insurance customers particularly value agent interactions, showing resistance to fully digital experiences. The insurance industry now faces pressure to balance cost-saving digital tools with meaningful customer connections in their claims handling processes.
McKinsey’s Focus on Cost Reduction for Insurers
McKinsey’s strategies have transformed how insurance companies manage costs during claims processing. Their data-driven approaches help insurers identify areas to reduce payouts while maintaining legal compliance.
Minimizing claim payouts through analytics
Insurance companies now use data analytics to reduce claim payouts while maintaining customer satisfaction. Advanced analytics tools help insurers spot patterns in claims data, allowing them to identify potentially inflated claims and negotiate more accurate settlements.
These systems have proven effective, with reports showing analytics can cut claims processing costs by up to 40%. Insurers apply predictive modeling to flag high-risk claims before they become expensive problems, creating a more efficient system for managing payouts without unnecessary expenses.
The integration of AI and machine learning has transformed how insurers handle fraud detection, decreasing fraudulent claims by approximately 20%. This technology examines thousands of data points across claims to spot inconsistencies that human adjusters might miss.
The next major shift in claims management focuses on operational expenses beyond direct payouts.
Optimization of operational expenses
McKinsey’s approach to insurance claims management focuses heavily on cutting operational costs through smart strategies. Carriers can slash expenses by up to 30% in underwriting and claims processing through targeted streamlining efforts.
The gap between top and bottom performers is striking – leading life insurance carriers spend just 2.6% of Gross Written Premiums on corporate functions, while underperformers spend more than double at 5.9%.
This financial optimization extends to contract management, where insurers achieve 20-30% cost reductions by renegotiating vendor agreements and adjusting service levels. Claims process enhancement through better case segmentation and automation boosts operational capacity by at least 25%, allowing companies to handle more claims without adding staff.
These expense management techniques create a direct impact on the bottom line while changing how your accident claim moves through the system. The focus on claims process improvement has transformed how insurers evaluate and respond to policyholder needs.
Emphasis on fraud detection technologies
Beyond cutting operational costs, insurers now place major focus on fraud detection systems. Insurance fraud creates massive financial losses across the industry. In the UK alone, effective fraud management saved GBP 1.1 billion in 2012.
German insurers face even greater challenges, with one in ten claims being fraudulent, resulting in EUR 4 billion in losses.
Modern fraud detection relies heavily on artificial intelligence to spot high-risk claims. AI tools scan through claims data to flag suspicious patterns that human reviewers might miss.
These systems improve both accuracy and speed in the claims process. Insurance companies can now process legitimate claims faster while directing more resources toward investigating potentially fraudulent activities.
This dual approach helps maintain fair pricing for honest policyholders while protecting the company’s financial stability.
Impacts on Policyholders
Policyholders now face stricter claim approval processes and often receive smaller settlements than before McKinsey’s influence. Many customers report feeling frustrated by automated systems that seem designed to minimize payouts rather than provide fair compensation.
Challenges in claim approval processes
Insurance companies have created new hurdles in claim approval that frustrate many policyholders. Forms now require more details, documentation demands have increased, and digital systems often reject claims for minor errors.
The rise of automated review systems has led to more denials based on strict rules rather than case-by-case review. These changes stem from McKinsey’s focus on cost-cutting strategies that prioritize insurer profits over customer satisfaction.
Generational gaps add another layer to approval challenges, as older customers struggle with digital claim filing tools that younger users expect. Complex claims still need human judgment despite technology advances, creating a bottleneck in the process.
Many insurers fail to balance efficient data use with proper privacy protections, risking customer trust and their reputation. The push for seamless customer interactions often clashes with outdated approval systems that weren’t designed for today’s expectations.
Perception of reduced fairness in settlements
Beyond approval challenges, many policyholders report feeling that settlements lack fairness after McKinsey’s influence on claims processes. This perception stems from insurance companies’ profit-focused strategies that often lead to systematic undervaluation of injury claims.
Policyholders frequently express frustration that property damage claims receive prompt payment while personal injury settlements face intense scrutiny and reduced offers. The gap between customer expectations and actual settlement amounts creates distrust in the claims process.
Fairness concerns have grown as claims adjusters follow standardized evaluation models rather than considering unique case factors. These models typically assign lower values to subjective damages like pain and suffering compared to pre-McKinsey practices.
The technological advancements in claims processing, while improving efficiency, sometimes remove the human judgment element that previously allowed for consideration of individual circumstances.
Policyholders increasingly demand greater transparency about how settlement amounts are calculated and why certain claims receive less compensation than expected.
Increased demand for transparency
Reduced fairness in settlements has led customers to push for more transparency from insurance companies. Policyholders now expect clear explanations about how their claims are processed and why certain decisions are made.
This shift reflects a growing public awareness about the role of data and algorithms in claims handling. Insurance companies must now share more information about their decision-making processes to maintain customer trust.
Transparency demands have grown as automation in claims processing increases. Regulators now require insurance companies to provide traceability in their scoring methods, especially with AI models.
Companies need to balance efficiency with openness about how they evaluate claims. Many insurers have started to implement disclosure policies that explain claim decisions in plain language.
This accountability helps protect customer rights while maintaining fair standards in the claims process.
Strategy Behind the Scenes: Why Insurance Companies Pay for Vehicle Damage but Fight Your Injury Claim
Insurance companies often settle vehicle damage claims quickly while fighting injury claims as part of a profit-focused strategy. McKinsey advised Allstate to maximize profits through intentional bad faith tactics, including low initial offers that fell 30% below market value.
This approach follows what experts call the “alligator” method – paying for visible car damage promptly while delaying personal injury settlements to frustrate claimants into accepting less money.
The tactic serves two purposes: it creates an image of fair dealing through quick property settlements while saving millions by underpaying on the more expensive injury claims.
Many major insurers adopted these practices despite facing legal scrutiny and fines for non-compliance with fair claim standards. The focus on profit margins directly impacts policyholders who need fair compensation after accidents.
Insurance adjusters receive training to handle property damage claims differently than injury claims, using specific scripts and tactics to minimize payouts while maintaining company profits.
This systematic approach to claims handling shows how corporate strategies can undermine the interests of the very customers who pay premiums for protection.
Integration of Technology in Claims Handling
Technology now drives every aspect of claims handling, from first report to final settlement. Insurance companies use advanced systems to track, analyze, and predict claim outcomes with greater accuracy than ever before.
Role of predictive analytics in claim outcomes
Predictive analytics transforms how insurance companies handle claims by using past data to forecast future results. Claims managers now rely on these tools to spot complex, costly claims early in the process.
This early identification allows insurers to allocate resources more effectively and prepare for potential financial impacts. The power of predictive analytics lies in its ability to process massive amounts of information and find patterns human analysts might miss.
Insurance companies benefit from more accurate case reserves thanks to data insights from predictive modeling. Machine learning enhances this process by continuously improving risk assessment models as new claims data enters the system.
Fraud detection becomes more precise as analytics tools flag unusual patterns that suggest dishonest claims. Financial forecasting improves dramatically when claims departments apply these data-driven approaches to their decision making processes.
Use of AI for fraud detection
Insurance companies now rely on artificial intelligence to spot potential fraud in claims processing. Lemonade’s AI chatbot, AI Jim, applies anti-fraud algorithms during claim assessments, flagging suspicious patterns that human agents might miss.
This technology enables faster claim resolution, with Lemonade paying approximately 30% of claims instantly after AI processing. The integration of these smart systems creates a more efficient claims process while protecting insurers from fraudulent activities.
Insurance fraud detection algorithms analyze data points across thousands of claims to identify high-risk submissions that require additional investigation.
Blockchain for claim tracking and security
Blockchain technology has transformed insurance claim processing through enhanced security and transparency. This distributed ledger system creates a permanent record of all claim transactions that cannot be altered, reducing fraud risks significantly.
Smart contracts built on blockchain platforms now automate claims processing, cutting the time needed for settlements from weeks to days. The technology verifies claim information across multiple sources instantly, eliminating manual checks that previously slowed the process.
Insurance companies report cost savings of 15-30% after implementing blockchain solutions for claims tracking. The secure nature of blockchain prevents unauthorized access to sensitive claim data while still allowing approved parties to view relevant information.
Policyholders benefit from real-time updates on their claim status through blockchain-powered portals. This technology also enables faster payments through direct transfers once claims meet pre-established conditions in the smart contract.
Controversies Surrounding McKinsey’s Practices
McKinsey’s consulting practices have faced serious criticism for promoting profit-driven strategies that often harm policyholders. Their methods have sparked lawsuits from consumers who claim insurance companies use McKinsey’s models to unfairly reduce claim payments.
Criticism of profit-over-customer approaches
McKinsey’s influence on insurance claims handling has faced harsh criticism for promoting profit-driven strategies at the expense of policyholders. Many consumer advocates point to internal policies at Allstate that reward adjusters for minimizing payouts, resulting in high claim denial rates.
This practice stems directly from the Claims Payment Reform (CCPR) that McKinsey helped develop, which places corporate profits above customer service. Insurance companies now use data analytics to identify which claims to fight or settle quickly, often leaving homeowners struggling during recovery periods.
The focus on “payout optimization” has created an adversarial relationship between insurers and their customers, with many valid claims being denied or severely undervalued. These unfair claims handling practices have sparked legal challenges and increased public scrutiny of business consulting firms that promote such approaches in the insurance industry.
Concerns over ethical implications in claims handling
McKinsey’s influence on insurance claims handling has raised serious ethical questions. Critics point to software systems that produce systematic lowball offers for injury claims, putting profits ahead of fair treatment.
The stark contrast between insurers’ friendly public image and their actual claims approach has earned the nickname “good hands versus boxing gloves,” especially regarding Allstate’s aggressive negotiation tactics.
Many claimants face unfair treatment through what industry watchdogs call the “deny, delay, defend” strategy. This approach aims to wear down injured parties by extending the claims process unnecessarily.
Insurance companies often exploit vulnerable claimants who need quick settlements for medical bills or lost wages. The systematic undervaluing of injury claims has become a controversial practice in claims management, with many seeing it as a direct result of profit-focused consulting strategies.
These practices have sparked legal challenges and public scrutiny as more policyholders experience the gap between marketing promises and the reality of filing a claim after an accident or injury.
Legal challenges and public scrutiny
McKinsey faced serious legal battles after internal documents exposed Allstate’s profit-focused claims strategy. These documents showed how the insurer planned to cut payouts while boosting profits, sparking lawsuits from consumers who felt cheated.
Courts in several states examined these practices, forcing insurance companies to defend their use of McKinsey’s methods. The public reacted strongly against these tactics, viewing them as unfair and harmful to accident victims.
This backlash pushed state regulators to increase their oversight of insurance practices and consider new consumer protection laws. Trust in the insurance industry dropped sharply as people learned how claims were being handled behind the scenes.
The growing pressure from both courts and the public has forced many insurers to rethink their approach to claims management.
The Future of Claims Management with McKinsey
McKinsey’s vision for claims management includes expanded AI tools, automated fraud detection systems, and predictive analytics that will reshape how insurance companies handle accident cases in the next decade.
Read more to discover how these changes might affect your future claims experience.
Expansion of automation and machine learning
Insurance companies now deploy AI-enabled technology across every step of the claims process. This shift allows insurers to handle claims with minimal human touch and choose specific moments to engage with customers.
Machine learning systems analyze past claims data to predict outcomes and spot patterns that humans might miss. The technology works especially well for simple claims, which can move through the system without any human review at all.
Complex claims still need human expertise despite automation advances. The insurance industry’s growing claims ecosystem creates new roles in claims prevention and increases demand for technical skills.
Data scientists and IT professionals become more valuable as companies build systems that connect Internet of Things devices for better data sharing. These technologies also strengthen fraud detection capabilities, helping insurers save money while processing claims more quickly for honest customers.
Greater focus on customer-centric solutions
Beyond automation and machine learning, McKinsey’s future vision includes a stronger focus on customer-centric solutions in claims management. Insurance companies now recognize that digital engagement gives customers more control over their claims, cutting inquiry calls by over 50%.
This shift places customer satisfaction at the center of claims processing strategies.
Real-time data and AI help create personalized claims experiences rather than one-size-fits-all approaches. Companies have developed new roles in user experience design to improve digital interactions with policyholders.
These changes allow straightforward claims to process automatically while giving customers better communication tools throughout their claim journey.
Potential regulatory interventions
Government agencies are stepping up their oversight of insurance claims practices as AI and automation reshape the industry. State legislators now draft bills to protect consumers from unfair practices that may arise from McKinsey-inspired claims models.
These laws will require insurance companies to explain how their automated systems reach decisions about claims payments. Regulators demand traceability in AI models and proper data usage protocols to ensure fairness.
Public policy makers also restrict access to sensitive health and genetic information to prevent discrimination in claims handling. Insurance companies must prepare for stricter rules about transparency as their automated systems become more complex.
The future of claims management will likely include a balance between efficiency goals and stronger consumer protection frameworks.
Technology continues to transform claims handling, but regulatory guardrails will shape how these innovations develop.
Conclusion
McKinsey’s consulting has forever changed how insurance companies handle accident claims. Their data-driven approach streamlined processes but often prioritized cost savings over customer satisfaction.
Insurers now use AI and automation to assess claims faster, though this efficiency sometimes leads to lower payouts for policyholders. The shift toward digital communication has reduced personal interactions, making claim disputes more challenging for accident victims.
Insurance companies readily pay for vehicle damage while fighting injury claims—a strategy McKinsey helped perfect through analytics and standardized evaluation methods. Policyholders must understand these tactics to protect their interests in the changing insurance landscape.
FAQs
1. How did McKinsey change insurance claim handling?
McKinsey introduced metrics-focused systems that prioritize speed and cost reduction over claim accuracy. Their consulting pushed insurers to use computer programs that set strict payment limits. This shift transformed claims from a service process to a profit center for insurance firms.
2. What is the “delay, deny, defend” strategy in insurance claims?
The “delay, deny, defend” approach is a claims handling method McKinsey developed. Insurance companies first delay response to claims, then deny valid claims outright, and finally defend their decisions aggressively if policyholders sue.
3. Has McKinsey’s influence affected accident victim compensation?
Yes. McKinsey’s methods have reduced payouts for many accident victims. Their systems often undervalue injuries and property damage, leaving claimants with less money than needed for full recovery.
4. What can I do if my accident claim seems unfairly processed?
Document everything related to your claim and request written explanations for any denials. Consider hiring an attorney who understands insurance tactics if your claim faces unusual delays or unexplained reductions. Many lawyers now specialize in fighting against these consultant-designed systems.
References
- https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/claims-in-the-digital-age
- https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Financial%20Services/Our%20Insights/Time%20for%20insurance%20companies%20to%20face%20digital%20reality/Digital-disruption-in-Insurance.pdf
- https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/insurance-2030-the-impact-of-ai-on-the-future-of-insurance (2021-03-12)
- https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/how-data-and-analytics-are-redefining-excellence-in-p-and-c-underwriting
- https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/claims-2030-dream-or-reality
- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-pilot-projects-enterprise-wide-ai-adoption-road-ahead-raju-1w4sc
- https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/driving%20impact%20at%20scale%20from%20automation%20and%20ai/driving-impact-at-scale-from-automation-and-ai.pdf
- https://www.insurants.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/04/Reinventing-Insurance-Claims-Processing-With-Data-Digitisation.pdf
- https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/insurance/elevating-customer-experience-a-win-win-for-insurers-and-customers
- https://www.avenga.com/magazine/revolutionizing-claims-management/ (2024-07-29)
- https://www.mckinsey.org/industries/financial-services/our-insights/the-productivity-imperative-for-us-life-and-annuities-carriers (2021-03-16)
- https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Financial%20Services/Our%20Insights/Claims%20management%20Taking%20a%20determined%20stand%20against%20insurance%20fraud/Claims_management_taking_a_determined_stand_against_fraud.pdf
- https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/jir-za-38-06-el-challenges-industry-future.pdf
- https://www.injurytriallawyer.com/blog/behind-mckinsey-companys-efforts-to-help-allstate-squeeze-personal-injury-victims/
- https://riskonnect.com/reporting-analytics/9-ways-predictive-analytics-in-insurance-claims-is-helping-to-achieve-better-outcomes/ (2025-01-31)
- https://customgpt.ai/generative-ai-use-cases-insurance-industry/
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373722926_Blockchain-Enhanced_Smart_Contract_for_Cost-Effective_Insurance_Claims_Processing
- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/blockchain-revolutionizing-insurance-claims-processing-how-spydra-ckz4c
- https://www.dontgethittwice.com/blog/2024/october/allstate-insurance-unfair-florida-claims-practic/ (2024-10-11)
- https://baxleymaniscalco.com/blog/what-are-the-mckinsey-documents/
- https://www.mckinsey.org/industries/financial-services/our-insights/the-power-and-potential-of-ai-in-insurance-claims (2019-10-28)